GM Bail Out

It seems we live in extraordinary times when the government takes on a 70% ownership of a for-profit enterprise. Actually, there is lots of precedent for government intervention from all administrations. Reagan "bailed out" Harley Davidson by giving them loans and favorable tariffs.

Taking on such a large equity stake, however, creates added potential problems related to simple management principle of allocating resources. Companies operate with limited resources -- they must make choices and prioritize. Very effective units within companies (or even whole companies) often pardoxically succeed BECAUSE they have fewer resources. Japanese auto companies in the 1950s could not compete with Detroit's vast production lines that took up lots of space (not available in the island country) forcing them to create lean manufacturing, which turned out be a great innovation and advantage.

Now consider a small unit inside a company. If it is managed well, someone has line authority of this unit with some kind of budget. And the good managers figure out how to get results with the resources they have. (Several baseball teams over the last twelve years have proven that they can win with significantly less money than some of their competition because they are more resourceful and innovative.) Now imagine the CEO parachuting in to run a unit -- he or she will most likely put more resources to bear not necessarily because they are needed (many times they are because the unit is being starved) but because he or she can do it. They just have easier access to people, cash budgets, etc. They have power, which includes easier access to resources.

Now consider President Obama and Congress (and every other VIP who will assert ownership) and the irresistable tempation to meddle and eventually pouring more resources to the problems rather than manage it. Forget the many unintended diasasters to the market by having a government player using policy and pusestrings to create market winners, the fundamental problem is that it will be too easy to throw $$ at problems that need to be managed with innovative ideas.

And here is one person's rendition of other unintended consequeces, as well.